How claims against doctors and hospitals work
This page covers physicians, other clinicians, and the hospitals, medical schools and practice groups they work for. In the cases on this page, the abuse was presented to patients as care: federal prosecutors describe Paduch’s abuse as committed “under the guise of medical treatment,” and the pending charges against Derrick Todd, who is presumed innocent, allege procedures he falsely claimed were necessary. A patient often cannot tell in the room. That is why so many of these claims turn on what the institution had already been told. The institutions hub lists the other kinds of institution we cover.
Battery or malpractice: why the label matters
A sexual touching that was not medically justified, or that the patient did not agree to, can be pleaded as battery or sexual assault. It can also be pleaded as medical malpractice, on the theory that the doctor departed from the standard of care. The label is not a formality. It decides which deadline applies, whether pre-suit notice is required, and in some states which damages rules apply.
California shows the difference. A claim for “professional negligence” against a health care provider must be brought “three years after the date of injury or one year after the plaintiff discovers” it, “whichever occurs first” (Code Civ. Proc. 340.5), and the provider must first be given “at least 90 days’ prior notice of the intention to commence the action” (Code Civ. Proc. 364). A civil claim for sexual assault of an adult, by contrast, can be brought within 10 years of the last act or three years from discovery, whichever is later, and no criminal prosecution is needed (Code Civ. Proc. 340.16). Which statute governs a given claim is for the court. A defendant may argue that a claim is really malpractice so that the shorter clock applies, which is one reason to have a lawyer look at the dates early.
Negligent hiring, supervision and credentialing
Claims against the institution are mostly state common law. Negligent hiring, supervision and retention ask whether an employer knew or should have known a doctor was a danger to patients and failed to act. Negligent credentialing asks the same of a hospital that granted a doctor privileges without employing him. Federal rules set some of the baseline. A hospital must check the National Practitioner Data Bank when a practitioner applies for privileges and every two years after that (45 CFR 60.17), and a hospital in Medicare must honor the patient’s “right to be free from all forms of abuse or harassment” (42 CFR 482.13(c)(3)).
What happens when a doctor moves on matters too. In its July 2026 agreement with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Weill Cornell Medicine’s recitals state that its former urology chair, asked by another institution that later hired Paduch, completed a reference form giving him a recommendation with “some reservation” and did not disclose the reason his appointment had not been renewed or any patient complaints.
Who can be held responsible
The doctor. The clinician who committed the abuse can be sued directly. A criminal case is separate and can run at the same time; see civil and criminal cases.
The employer. A hospital, university, medical school or practice group that employed the doctor can be named for its own negligence and, depending on the state, for the employee’s acts.
The hospital that granted privileges. Many doctors are not hospital employees. A hospital that credentialed one, and that received complaints about him, can face a negligent credentialing claim.
Parent systems and affiliates. Large health systems are often several legal entities. Which one employed the doctor, ran the clinic and received the complaints is a factual question the records answer.
Abuse of a child patient follows the childhood rules described on our guides to child sexual abuse and grooming; abuse of an adult is covered on our guide to adult sexual assault. Survivors can often sue under initials; see filing anonymously.
Deadline issues for medical claims
Revival windows. California has opened time-limited windows for older claims several times. One revived claims over sexual misconduct by physicians at student health centers from 1988 to 2017 and closed at the end of 2020; another revived claims involving UCLA physicians for 1983 to 2019 and closed at the end of 2021 (Code Civ. Proc. 340.16(c) and (d)). The window now open, under AB 250 (Stats. 2025, ch. 682), runs from January 1, 2026 to December 31, 2027. It revives adult sexual assault claims that were time-barred, where the plaintiff alleges that an entity “engaged in a cover up or attempted a cover up of a previous instance or allegations of sexual assault.” It does not apply to public entities.
Public hospitals. A claim against a county or university hospital that is a public body usually requires a written claim first. In California the deadline is six months after the claim accrues (Gov. Code 911.2), unless the claim is for childhood sexual abuse, which is exempt.
Charitable immunity. Some states still limit what a nonprofit can be made to pay. In Massachusetts, a charity’s liability for a tort committed in carrying out its charitable purposes “shall not exceed the sum of twenty thousand dollars,” and for “medical malpractice claims against a nonprofit organization providing health care,” $100,000, with no cap for activities “primarily commercial in character” (Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 231, sec. 85K). These are statutory limits, not a measure of any claim, and how they apply to a given case is for the court.
Deadlines in other states are in our statute of limitations reference.
The deadlines described here are general rules, and most of them have exceptions. The date that governs a particular claim turns on the state, the person’s age when the abuse happened, when they connected it to the harm it caused, and who the defendant is. A claim against a public agency or a public school can carry a written notice requirement that runs out long before the ordinary deadline.
Nothing on this page can tell you your own date. A lawyer who looks at your facts can, and there is no charge to ask.
Active litigation involving doctors and hospitals
Each matter below is an allegation unless it says a court or jury has ruled. Status is as of the date given.
Agreement with federal prosecutors signed July 25 and 26, 2026; over $1 billion paid or agreed to settle victims’ claims.
Over 200 civil plaintiffs; the doctor pleaded not guilty to new charges on April 23, 2026.
Suits by former patients of an obstetrician-gynecologist, 330 women according to an October 22, 2025 report. Pretrial.
Weill Cornell Medicine
Darius Paduch, a urologist, was convicted in 2024 after a criminal trial of six counts of inducement to travel to engage in unlawful sexual activity and five counts of inducement of a minor to do so, and was sentenced to life in prison, according to the voluntary compliance agreement signed on July 25 and 26, 2026. In that agreement Weill Cornell “acknowledges that the policies and programs that WCM had in place at the time of Paduch’s offenses to detect, prevent, and respond to sexual abuse of patients were not adequate.” It recites that WCM “has paid or agreed to pay over $1 billion to settle claims from victims to date,” and the U.S. Attorney declined criminal charges against the institution. Cornell called the resolution “a significant step forward” in a July 27, 2026 statement. We have not confirmed the status of claims against the other hospitals where Paduch later worked.
Brigham and Women’s and Charles River Medical Associates
More than 200 former patients of Derrick Todd, a rheumatologist, have sued him, Brigham and Women’s Faulkner Hospital and Charles River Medical Associates, according to WBUR (April 23, 2026). Todd has been charged in Middlesex County with 22 counts of rape and indecent assault and battery, and on April 23, 2026 he pleaded not guilty in Suffolk County to 81 further felony counts involving 22 former patients, WBUR reported. The charges are pending and he is presumed innocent. Through counsel, Todd has said he “believes that he has done nothing wrong and will defend against such claims vigorously.” Brigham has said it “deeply regret[s] the harm this has caused to our patients and their families.”
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Since October 1, 2024, former patients of an obstetrician-gynecologist who practiced at Cedars-Sinai have filed suits in Los Angeles alleging that he abused them and that the hospital failed to act. The first filing involved 35 women, according to the plaintiffs’ lawyers, and a further 112 joined in October 2025, bringing the total to 330, according to Beverly Press (October 22, 2025). The same report says he surrendered his California medical license in May 2025 after a Medical Board accusation of negligent care, that he has denied the allegations, and that he is under criminal investigation. We found no criminal charge, so we do not name him. Cedars-Sinai said the alleged behavior “is counter to Cedars-Sinai’s core values” and that he “no longer has privileges to practice medicine at Cedars-Sinai.” For adult patients of a private California hospital, the governing deadline rules are those in Code Civ. Proc. 340.16, including the 2026 to 2027 window described above.
Among closed matters, Columbia University and NewYork-Presbyterian reached a $750 million settlement with 576 survivors of Robert Hadden, a gynecologist convicted federally in January 2023, according to Insurance Journal (May 7, 2025). The case tracker lists every matter we follow.
Where to go next
Abuse in a psychiatric hospital or treatment program is covered on our page about residential treatment and psychiatric care, abuse in elder care on our nursing homes page, and abuse by team doctors on our page about youth and college sports. Reporting abuse explains how to report to police and to a state medical board, and how to file a claim walks through what a lawsuit involves. If you want a lawyer to look at your own dates, a free, confidential case review costs nothing and commits you to nothing.
Questions we are asked most
It can be pleaded as malpractice, as battery or sexual assault, or both, and the label changes the deadline. In California, a professional negligence claim must be filed within three years of the injury or one year from discovery, whichever comes first, after 90 days' notice, while an adult sexual assault claim has 10 years or three years from discovery. Which rule governs a particular claim is for the court.
Yes. A hospital, medical school or practice group can be sued for negligent hiring, supervision or retention if it employed the doctor, and for negligent credentialing if it granted privileges. Hospitals must check the National Practitioner Data Bank when a doctor applies for privileges and every two years after that (45 CFR 60.17).
Possibly. California opened a window from January 1, 2026 to December 31, 2027 for adult sexual assault claims that were time-barred, where an entity is alleged to have covered up earlier assaults; it does not apply to public entities. Other states have different rules, which our statute of limitations reference summarizes.
No. A civil claim is separate from any prosecution, and California's adult sexual assault statute says no criminal case or conviction is needed. The two can run at the same time, and a civil claim uses a lower standard of proof.
In a voluntary compliance agreement with federal prosecutors signed July 25 and 26, 2026, Weill Cornell Medicine acknowledged that its policies at the time were not adequate to detect, prevent and respond to the sexual abuse of patients. The agreement says it has paid or agreed to pay over $1 billion to settle victims' claims and that Paduch was convicted in 2024 and sentenced to life in prison.
In some states, partly. Massachusetts caps a charity's liability at $20,000 for torts committed in its charitable work and at $100,000 for medical malpractice claims against a nonprofit health care organization, with no cap for activities that are primarily commercial. These are statutory limits, not a measure of any claim.
- California Code of Civil Procedure 340.5, professional negligence Accurate as of October 5, 2026.
- California Code of Civil Procedure 364, notice of intent to sue a health care provider Accurate as of October 5, 2026.
- California Code of Civil Procedure section 340.16, as amended by Stats. 2025, ch. 682 (AB 250) Accurate as of October 5, 2026.
- California Government Code 911.2, time to present claims Accurate as of October 5, 2026.
- 45 CFR 60.17, information hospitals must request from the National Practitioner Data Bank Accurate as of October 5, 2026.
- 42 CFR 482.13, hospital condition of participation: patient's rights Accurate as of October 5, 2026.
- Massachusetts General Laws ch. 231, sec. 85K, charitable organizations Accurate as of October 5, 2026.
- U.S. Attorney, S.D.N.Y.: Weill Cornell Medicine voluntary compliance agreement (July 2026) Accurate as of July 26, 2026.
- Cornell University statement on the agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office (July 27, 2026) Accurate as of July 27, 2026.
- WBUR, Former Brigham and Women's doctor pleads not guilty to 81 new counts of sexual assault (news reporting) Accurate as of April 23, 2026.
- NBC Boston, Over 100 plaintiffs now suing Brigham and Women's doctor (news reporting) Accurate as of October 17, 2023.
- Beverly Press, Lawsuit grows against former Cedars-Sinai OB-GYN (news reporting) Accurate as of October 22, 2025.
- Plaintiffs' counsel release on the first Cedars-Sinai filings (Business Wire) (news reporting) Accurate as of December 30, 2024.
- Insurance Journal: Court approves $750 million settlement for survivors of abuse by NY gynecologist (May 7, 2025) (news reporting) Accurate as of May 7, 2025.